Study-unit MORAL PHILOSOPHY
| Course name | Philosophy and ethics of relationships |
|---|---|
| Study-unit Code | GP005054 |
| Curriculum | Didattico |
| Lecturer | Massimo Borghesi |
| Lecturers |
|
| Hours |
|
| CFU | 12 |
| Course Regulation | Coorte 2022 |
| Supplied | 2022/23 |
| Supplied other course regulation | |
| Learning activities | Caratterizzante |
| Area | Istituzioni di filosofia |
| Sector | M-FIL/03 |
| Type of study-unit | Obbligatorio (Required) |
| Type of learning activities | Attività formativa monodisciplinare |
| Language of instruction | Italian |
| Contents | Political theology, secularization, atheism. The dialectic between philosophy and religion in the modern era |
| Reference texts | M. BORGHESI, >, Marietti 2013. M. BORGHESI, >, Marietti 2011. M. BORGHESI, >, Jaca Book 2019. M. BORGHESI, >, Studium 2020 |
| Educational objectives | The course aims to analyze the complex motivations that govern the relationship between religion and philosophical-political-economic thought in the transition from the first to the second modernity. |
| Prerequisites | Adequate knowledge of the history of modern philosophy. This precondition is valid both for attending and not attending students. |
| Teaching methods | The course is organized according to oral lectures. The possibility of seminar lessons is not excluded |
| Other information | Email: massimoborghesi@unipg.it |
| Learning verification modality | The exam includes an oral test which consists of a discussion lasting about 30 minutes aimed at ascertaining the level of knowledge and understanding reached by the student on the theoretical and methodological contents indicated in the program. The oral test will also allow to verify the student's communication skills with language properties and autonomous organization of the exhibition on the same theoretical topics. |
| Extended program | The course aims to analyze the historical and ideal roots and motivations behind the various directions of modern atheism and the various forms of secularization. For this purpose, the different interpretations on atheism proposed by Del Noce, Fabro, de Lubac, Maritain, Gilson will be discussed. |